Helpdesk

Top image

Editorial board

Darius Andriukaitis
Kaunas University of Technology, Lithuania

Alexander Argyros
The University of Sydney, Australia

Radu Arsinte
Technical University of Cluj Napoca, Romania

Ivan Baronak
Slovak University of Technology, Slovakia

Khosrow Behbehani
The University of Texas at Arlington, United States

Mohamed El Hachemi Benbouzid
University of Brest, France

Dalibor Biolek
University of Defence, Czech Republic

Klara Capova
University of Zilina, Slovakia

Erik Chromy
UPC Broadband Slovakia, Slovakia

Milan Dado
University of Zilina, Slovakia

Petr Drexler
Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic

Eva Gescheidtova
Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic

Ray-Guang Cheng
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taiwan, Province of China

Gokhan Hakki Ilk
Ankara University, Turkey

Janusz Jezewski
Institute of Medical Technology and Equipment, Poland

Rene Kalus
VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic

Ivan Kasik
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Czech Republic

Jan Kohout
University of Defence, Czech Republic

Ondrej Krejcar
University of Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic

Miroslaw Luft
Technical University of Radom, Poland

Stanislav Marchevsky
Technical University of Kosice, Slovakia

Byung-Seo Kim
Hongik University, Korea

Valeriy Arkhin
Buryat State University, Russia

Rupak Kharel
University of Huddersfield, United Kingdom

Fayaz Hussain
Ton Duc Thang University, Vietnam

Peppino Fazio
Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy

Fazel Mohammadi
University of New Haven, United States of America

Thang Trung Nguyen
Ton Duc Thang University, Vietnam

Le Anh Vu
Ton Duc Thang University, Vietnam

Miroslav Voznak
VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic

Zbigniew Leonowicz
Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Poland

Wasiu Oyewole Popoola
The University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Yuriy S. Shmaliy
Guanajuato University, Mexico

Lorand Szabo
Technical University of Cluj Napoca, Romania

Tran Trung Duy
Posts and Telecommunications Institute of Technology, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Xingwang Li
Henan Polytechnic University, China

Huynh Van Van
Ton Duc Thang University, Vietnam

Lubos Rejfek
University of Pardubice, Czech Republic

Neeta Pandey
Delhi Technological University, India

Huynh The Thien
Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, Vietnam

Mauro Tropea
DIMES Department of University of Calabria, Italy

Gaojian Huang
Henan Polytechnic University, China

Nguyen Quang Sang
Ho Chi Minh City University of Transport, Vietnam

Anh-Tu Le
Ho Chi Minh City University of Transport, Vietnam

Phu Tran Tin
Ton Duc Thang University, Vietnam


Home Search Mail RSS


Design of an Open Hardware Bridge Between Robots and ROS/non-ROS Environments

Yves Bergeon, Vaclav Krivanek

DOI: 10.15598/aeee.v16i2.2439


Abstract

To be able to use robots of the same type in a swarm (in this case differential-drive robots) from a centralized computer, you need to control them in the same way even if the robots come from different manu\-facturers. These robots should have the same capabilities: i.e. the same type of sensors and the same type of control commands. Currently, if we need to add sensors on a robot, we should first find out what are the hardware capabilities and what are the tools provided by the manufacturer (some have microcontrollers, others have ARM processors). The protocol to communicate with the onboard card (often a serial protocol) is different for each robot and we have to take that in account in our software so that the robots can be interchangeable.
This paper describes the design and the results of using a standard interface (bridge) on a robot which allows wireless communication with a centralized computer and local serial communication with a mobile robot. On this interface, we can connect every sensor we want (infrared, ultrasound, laser, Kinect etc.) and we can always use the same tools to control them.
Extension of the protocol of the Kobuki base (TurtleBot2) is proposed to be able to use the same type of frame as the TurtleBot 2 uses and to continue to use ROS middleware as is, but with the possibility to use data from new sensors implemented on the bridge. This article will focus on the use of the TurtleBot 2, but the same bridge will be adapted to other robots allowing their interchangeability in the future.

Keywords


Differential-drive robot; interface; robotics; ROS; swarm; Turtlebot2; unicycle robot.

Full Text:

PDF